Immigration policy has become increasingly consequential for governments, businesses, and economies worldwide. In the United States, immigration has featured prominently in headlines and political debate for the past two years. Across Western Europe, public demonstrations and political debates have addressed migration, economic pressures, national identity, public services, and social cohesion. Similar questions are part of policy discussions in countries around the world.

But immigration is not solely a domestic political issue. In an increasingly interconnected global economy, immigration policy influences how multinational companies operate, where they invest, how they deploy talent, and which countries remain competitive in attracting businesses and capital.

In 2026, immigration policy sits at the intersection of national sovereignty, economic competitiveness, global workforce strategy, foreign investment, and social stability. Government approaches to these priorities may have effects beyond national borders.

Immigration Policy and the Global Economy

International migration is a feature of the modern global economy. Companies operate across borders, supply chains span continents, and specialized knowledge moves between markets. Businesses rely on the ability to recruit employees with the necessary skills, transfer executives and technical personnel between offices, establish new operations, and respond to changing economic conditions.

Immigration policies affect these activities.

A multinational company expanding into a new market must consider more than corporate tax rates, infrastructure, and access to customers. It must also evaluate whether it can obtain work authorization for essential personnel, relocate management teams, recruit specialized professionals, and move employees between jurisdictions efficiently. Immigration restrictions, processing delays, and uncertainty about future requirements can affect the cost, timing, and feasibility of those decisions.

These considerations arise in industries that depend on specialized expertise, including technology, financial services, health care, advanced manufacturing, energy, and life sciences. When companies cannot access the talent they need in a particular market, they may consider alternative locations for certain functions, projects, or investments.

Immigration policy is part of the environment in which global companies make strategic decisions. It can influence a country’s ability to attract foreign direct investment, support innovation, develop emerging industries, and compete for internationally mobile talent.

The Competition for Talent and Investment

Countries are competing not only for businesses and capital, but also for the people who drive economic growth. Highly skilled professionals, entrepreneurs, researchers, and investors can contribute to innovation, job creation, productivity, and the development of new industries. International mobility allows companies to place expertise where it is needed and enables employees to share knowledge across offices and markets.

For global companies, access to international talent can be important to executing business strategy. An executive may need to establish a new regional headquarters. An engineer may need to work alongside a team developing new technology. A specialist may need to transfer knowledge to employees in another country. An entrepreneur may seek to establish a business in a new market and recruit a team to expand its operations.

The immigration framework governing these activities can affect business decisions.

This does not mean that countries should pursue unrestricted immigration. Governments must determine which categories of migration serve their economic and national interests, establish appropriate eligibility requirements, and ensure compliance with applicable laws. Governments may seek to balance national interests with economic competitiveness.

Investment-Based Immigration: Mobilizing Private Capital for Economic Growth

Immigration policy can support economic growth by facilitating the movement of workers and specialized talent and by attracting foreign investors and private capital. Investment-based immigration programs are one potential means of encouraging business formation, financing economic development, and supporting job creation.

In a competitive global economy, countries are continually seeking ways to attract foreign direct investment, expand productive capacity, and finance projects that contribute to long-term economic growth. Investor immigration programs can provide pathways for eligible foreign nationals to invest in qualifying businesses and projects in connection with an application for immigration status.

The U.S. EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program illustrates this model. Established by Congress in 1990, the program is intended to stimulate the U.S. economy through foreign investment and job creation. Eligible investors must make qualifying investments in U.S. commercial enterprises and satisfy applicable job creation requirements. Depending on the investment structure, EB-5 capital can support business operations, real estate development, and other qualifying economic activities. The regional center framework also permits qualifying indirect job creation to be considered under applicable rules.

Under this model, private investors provide capital for qualifying economic activities. When deployed productively, the capital may help finance projects, support businesses, generate economic activity, and create employment opportunities.

This model differs from economic development initiatives that may require direct government expenditure, public financing, or taxpayer-funded incentives. Investment immigration programs also require government administration, oversight, and enforcement, and their net fiscal effects depend on program design and implementation.

Not every investment necessarily qualifies as foreign direct investment under formal economic statistical definitions. Nevertheless, these programs may provide a means of attracting private international capital as part of broader investment promotion strategies.

The benefits depend on credible program design and oversight. Governments must ensure that investment requirements are meaningful, funds are deployed in accordance with applicable rules, job creation requirements are satisfied, and fraud and financial misconduct are addressed. Investors also need appropriate transparency about project structures, material risks, and the terms governing their investments.

Depending on program design and administration, investment-based immigration may align the interests of foreign investors with certain economic priorities of host countries. Businesses and projects may gain access to private capital, and the host economy may benefit from investment and employment.

Global Companies Operate Across Borders, While Immigration Laws Remain National

One challenge for multinational businesses is the difference between the global nature of their operations and the country-specific nature of immigration law. A company may have offices in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, while each jurisdiction has its own admission rules, work authorization categories, documentation requirements, processing timelines, and compliance obligations. An employee who can legally work in one country does not automatically have the right to work in another. A corporate restructuring, acquisition, new assignment, or change in job responsibilities may raise immigration questions that may need to be addressed before the business proceeds. These issues arise as companies restructure operations, establish regional hubs, expand into new markets, and respond to geopolitical and economic uncertainty.

For global employers, immigration compliance can form part of enterprise risk management. A failure to anticipate work authorization requirements can delay a transaction, disrupt a project, expose a company to penalties, or prevent an employee from performing an essential role. Immigration requirements may be relevant to workforce planning, mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructuring, international assignments, and long-term business strategy.

International mobility also affects employees and their families. Uncertainty about immigration status, employment authorization, or family members’ ability to accompany them can influence whether an individual accepts an assignment or remains with an employer.

The Economic Benefits — and Costs — Must Be Evaluated

The global economic implications of immigration are complex, and its benefits and costs are not automatic.

Immigration can help address labor shortages, expand the available talent pool, support entrepreneurship, attract investment, and contribute to tax revenues. International mobility can also facilitate knowledge transfer, research collaboration, and the development of businesses operating across multiple markets.

Population growth can place pressure on housing, transportation, schools, health care, and other public services, particularly where infrastructure and government capacity have not kept pace. Effects on wages and employment can vary across industries, skill levels, regions, and time periods. Governments also address the costs of administering immigration systems, enforcing legal requirements, and supporting integration.

These issues are relevant to national policymakers and corporate leaders. Employers may rely on access to workers and specialized talent, as well as functioning infrastructure, stable communities and a productive workforce. Policy decisions may involve weighing the benefits of attracting international talent and investment against local labor market conditions, public spending, and communities’ capacity to accommodate population growth.

The effects also extend across borders. Countries of origin may benefit from remittances, international business networks, and the return of workers with new skills, while also facing the loss of professionals in critical sectors. Destination countries may gain expertise and economic activity while also addressing integration and local pressures. The balance varies by country and migration category. Policy analysis may consider reliable data, transparent objectives, and both immediate impacts and long-term outcomes.

Security, Integration, and Public Confidence

Immigration policy also involves considerations beyond economic competitiveness. Government policies address border management, fraud and exploitation, national security and enforcement of immigration laws. Public confidence may be affected by how consistently and credibly those responsibilities are carried out.

At the same time, immigration encompasses different legal categories and policy objectives. Employment-based migration, family reunification, international students, humanitarian protection, temporary visitors, investment-based immigration, and irregular migration involve different legal frameworks and considerations. They should not be treated as interchangeable. Immigration systems may distinguish between these categories, apply appropriate standards, and maintain procedures for adjudication and enforcement. Integration is another consideration. Language education, access to employment, recognition of professional qualifications, and participation in civic life can affect newcomers’ participation in their communities and host economies.

For multinational employers, these issues have practical consequences. Companies need employees who can work legally, adapt to local requirements, and participate effectively in the workplace. Governments need immigration systems that are credible, enforceable, and capable of responding to legitimate public concerns. Effective policy must account for both objectives.

Policy Predictability and Global Business

For companies operating internationally, relevant factors include whether immigration rules are clear, consistently administered, and sufficiently predictable to support planning.

Frequent changes to eligibility requirements, application procedures, processing priorities, or compliance obligations can complicate hiring and relocation decisions. Uncertainty can affect project schedules, increase legal and administrative costs, and make it more difficult for companies to determine where to locate certain operations.

This is particularly relevant when businesses make investments requiring long-term commitments. A company deciding where to establish a research facility, regional headquarters, or specialized manufacturing operation will often evaluate the availability of talent over the life of the investment — not merely the rules in effect on the date of the decision.

Immigration policy may change in response to economic conditions, security concerns, and changing public priorities. But clear communication, reasonable implementation periods, efficient administration, and transparent eligibility standards can help businesses adapt while allowing governments to pursue policy objectives.

Immigration Policy in a Global Economy

Immigration policy will remain part of public and business discussions in 2026 and beyond. Demographic shifts, workforce shortages, geopolitical instability, technological developments, and changing public expectations will continue to shape how countries approach migration.

Policy discussions address how governments can control immigration while attracting talent. They also consider domestic workers, workforce shortages, private foreign investment and safeguards for investors and the public, alongside the costs and benefits of migration for different communities.

For global companies, immigration policy choices can affect international operations, talent acquisition, investment, and long-term competitiveness. Government approaches reflect national priorities and the economic realities of an interconnected world.

Immigration policy has implications beyond border management. It helps determine how economies access skills, how companies deploy people and capital, how countries attract investment, how governments respond to demographic change, and how societies balance economic opportunity with security and social cohesion.

In a global economy, immigration policy also has implications for business and investment. Government decisions may influence where talent and private capital move, where companies expand, and how economies compete for investment and skilled workers. 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Kate Kalmykov Kate Kalmykov

Kate Kalmykov is based in our New York and New Jersey offices and has over two decades of experience in business immigration matters. Kate currently Co-Chairs the Global Immigration & Compliance Practice at Greenberg Traurig. In this role, she works with employers of

…

Kate Kalmykov is based in our New York and New Jersey offices and has over two decades of experience in business immigration matters. Kate currently Co-Chairs the Global Immigration & Compliance Practice at Greenberg Traurig. In this role, she works with employers of all sizes across a variety of industries in understanding and complying with the immigration laws relating to the hiring and retention of foreign talent. Specifically, her practice focuses on supporting clients and advising them on temporary and permanent residency immigration options for multi-national executive, business, scientific, and information technology personnel. In addition, her practice provides support to companies in the global transfer of personnel. Known by her clients for her out-of-the-box thinking, responsiveness and hands-on approach, Kate is often called upon to assist in developing immigration options and strategies in the most unique circumstances and to respond to complex Requests for Evidence (RFEs), Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs) or to appeal denied cases. Likewise, she has also been instrumental in developing employer compliance programs for DOL related filings including H-1Bs and PERMs, as well as for I-9 employment eligibility verification. To this end, she develops and conducts nationwide I-9 compliance trainings and policy manuals for human resources personnel, advises on best practices for E-Verify employers, provides guidance on avoiding immigration-related unfair employment practices claims and has defended and minimized penalties in immigration-related government audits. Kate regularly works with professionals from the firm’s labor, employment, tax and benefits groups, to provide strategic planning on immigration issues within a cross-border framework.

Kate also has deep experience working on all aspects of the EB-5 immigrant investor program. Kate has worked with real estate developers, private equity funds, and other organizations on applications to designate new EB-5 Regional Centers, applications for pre-approval of EB-5 projects; having projects adopted by existing EB-5 Regional Centers; structuring projects to be EB-5 compliant, the sale of existing EB-5 Regional Centers, preparing template I-526 petitions and advice on structuring direct EB-5 projects. Pursuant to the requirements introduced under the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act, Kate works with EB-5 Regional Centers, EB-5 Projects, Overseas Migration Agents and Broker/ Dealers to develop internal programs for ongoing compliance and to prepare USCIS I-956, I-956F, I-956,G, I-956H, I-956K submissions. Kate has represented thousands of investors in obtaining their green cards through EB-5 regional center projects, as well as direct EB-5 investment opportunities. She also represented and structured the largest EB-5 offering in the Program’s history and has over the course of her career structured over $12 billion in EB-5 deals.

Within the field of immigration law, Kate is a well-known speaker and author. She is often called upon by various media outlets to comment on topics of business immigration law including the Real Deal, the Wall Street Journal, and Law360. Kate has appeared on numerous TV programs related to immigration law including CNN, the Stoler Report, Vietface TV, and China Business Network. Kate is also a prolific writer on the topic of immigration and has been published in immigration practice handbooks for the American Bar Association, American Immigration Lawyers Association, ILW, and in news periodicals that include the New Jersey Lawyer, the New York Law Journal, the New Jersey Law Journal, USA Today, GlobeSt.com, and the Commercial Observer. At the request of the American Bar Association, Kate co-authored the book “What Every Lawyer Needs to Know About Immigration Law,” a guide for non-lawyers on immigration law practice. She has sat on numerous bar association related committees including the American Immigration Lawyers Association EB-5 Practice Committee, the New Jersey Business Immigration Coalition and has chaired the American Bar Association’s, Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, Section of Administrative Law since 2011. Kate has been recognized in various legal surveys including Chambers Global, New York Super Lawyers, the New Jersey Law Journal who ranked as her as a “New Leader of the Bar,” (formerly 40 under 40) in 2012, NJBIZ “Best 50 Women in Business,” 2019, National Law Review, “Go-To Thought Leader: Immigration Law,” 2022, and Lawdragon 500, Leading U.S. Corporate Employment Lawyers, 2020-2022.

Kate is devoted to pro bono matters and has spent extensive time helping clients fleeing conflict and persecution with asylum applications, applying for and obtaining Temporary Protected Status and Humanitarian Parole.