Skip to content

Navigating the Future of H-1B, L-1 and O-1 Visas

As the new Trump administration takes shape, tech companies and foreign workers are keenly observing potential changes to the H-1B visa program and other related tech visas. The administration is expected to appease its opposing stakeholders by maintaining strong relationships with the tech industry while also addressing concerns from those advocating for stricter immigration policies.

H-1B and L-1 Visas: A Balancing Act

While some factions within the administration may push for a reduction in high-skilled immigration, the administration’s close ties with tech companies suggests it will likely maintain current levels of H-1B and L-1 visa issuances. The tech industry heavily relies on these visas, and any drastic reduction could disrupt business operations and innovation. However, procedural changes that we saw in the previous administration, as well as new ones, might be introduced to indirectly limit access, such as increased scrutiny during adjudications, slower processing times, increased requests for evidence, higher denial rates, and more frequent site visits.

A particular focus is expected on third-party placement firms and staffing companies, which have been accused of misusing the H-1B program. Companies that are in the outsourcing/staffing industry may face heightened scrutiny and additional requirements, especially in terms of documenting third-party worksite placements.

Buy American, Hire American: Implications and Expectations

The anticipated “Buy American, Hire American” executive order could lead to reviews of companies using large numbers of H-1B visas to determine if they are prioritizing foreign workers over U.S. citizens. This may also involve increased activity from the Department of Justice’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER), which scrutinizes whether foreign nationals are being unfairly preferred in hiring.

Geopolitical Considerations and Security Checks

The administration might impose stricter limitations on H-1B visa holders from countries perceived as unfriendly, such as China and those countries that have been designated as state sponsors of terrorism. Enhanced security and administrative checks could lead to delays for nationals from these countries, reflecting broader geopolitical concerns. The administration could also bring back its Travel Bans via executive orders, as it did previously.

Potential Revisions to Existing Policies

There is speculation about reversing USCIS’s deference policy, which has allowed USCIS adjudicators to rely on prior approvals involving the same parties and facts rather that adjudicating every visa petition from scratch. While the recent H-1B modernization rule codifies the deference policy, the administration could issue directives requiring case-by-case reviews, potentially complicating and slowing the process for employers and applicants.

Additionally, work authorization for some spouses of tech workers may disappear. The Trump administration proposed eliminating the H-4 EAD in 2021 and it may try to do this again. There have been no similar attempts at, or discussions around, rescinding L-2 work authorization.

Optional Practical Training (OPT) and STEM OPT

Previous attempts by the Trump administration to limit OPT and STEM OPT were met with resistance from the tech industry and educational institutions. Further restrictions on these programs seem unlikely in the short term because any changes would likely face significant pushback due to their importance to tech companies and universities.

Prevailing Wage and Union Advocacy

Efforts to increase prevailing wages for H-1B workers may gain traction, with heightened scrutiny on companies accused of undercutting wages through foreign hires. The incoming head of the Department of Labor could advocate for policies that favor higher prevailing wages and address union concerns.

Conclusion: Navigating Uncertainty

While the new administration may introduce challenges for high-skilled immigration, the business community’s pushback and the economic benefits of these programs could help prevent implementation of any drastic measures. Companies and foreign workers should stay informed and prepare for potential procedural changes.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Rebecca B. Schechter ‡ Rebecca B. Schechter ‡

Rebecca Schechter focuses her practice on business immigration and compliance, representing multi-national corporations midsized companies, and startups, as well as individual clients. She has experience with all areas of employment-based immigration, particularly H-1B, L-1, O-1 and E-2 petitions, as well as outstanding researcher…

Rebecca Schechter focuses her practice on business immigration and compliance, representing multi-national corporations midsized companies, and startups, as well as individual clients. She has experience with all areas of employment-based immigration, particularly H-1B, L-1, O-1 and E-2 petitions, as well as outstanding researcher petitions and labor certification applications. Rebecca regularly assists GT clients with global immigration matters, including business and work visas to countries in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America. She also works on state and federal I-9 and E-Verify audits. Rebecca has a thorough understanding of third party contractor issues and experience handling complex naturalization, deportation defense, family and employment-based adjustment applications.

Admitted in Maryland and Connecticut. Not admitted in Virginia. Practice limited to federal immigration practice.
Photo of Laura Foote Reiff ‡ Laura Foote Reiff ‡

Laura Foote Reiff has more than 35 years of experience representing businesses and organizations in the business immigration and compliance field. She is also a business immigration advocate and has long chaired prominent business immigration coalitions. Laura is Co-Founder of GT’s Business and

Laura Foote Reiff has more than 35 years of experience representing businesses and organizations in the business immigration and compliance field. She is also a business immigration advocate and has long chaired prominent business immigration coalitions. Laura is Co-Founder of GT’s Business and Immigration and Compliance Group which she co-led since 1999. She currently Co-Chairs the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice’s International Employment, Immigration & Workforce Strategies group and chairs the Northern Virginia/Washington D.C. Immigration and Compliance Practice. Laura is also Co-Managing Shareholder of the Northern Virginia Office of GT, a position she has held since 2010. As a global leader in the business immigration community, Laura has served on the Boards of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the American Immigration Council, the America is Better Board. She is currently on the Board of the National Immigration Forum and chairs the US Chamber of Commerce Immigration Subcommittee.

Laura advises corporations on a variety of compliance-related issues, particularly related to Form I-9 eligibility employment verification matters. Laura has been involved in audits and internal investigations and has successfully minimized monetary exposure as well as civil and criminal liabilities on behalf of her clients. She develops immigration compliance strategies and programs for both small and large companies. Laura performs I-9, H-1B and H-2B compliance inspections during routine internal reviews, while performing due diligence (in the context of a merger, acquisition or sale) or while defending a company against a government investigation. She works closely with Exchange Visitor Programs on Designation, Change in Control and Compliance.

Laura’s practice also consists of managing business immigration matters and providing immigration counsel to address the visa and work authorization needs of U.S. and global personnel including professionals, managers and executives, treaty investors/ traders, essential workers, persons of extraordinary ability, corporate trainees, and students. She is an immigration policy advocacy expert and works on immigration reform policies.

Laura represents many businesses in creating, managing and using “Regional Centers” that can create indirect jobs toward the 10 new U.S. jobs whose creation can give rise to EB-5 permanent residence for investment. She coordinates this work with attorneys practicing in securities law compliance, with economists identifying “targeted employment areas” and projecting indirect job creation, and with licensed securities brokers coordinating offerings. She also represents individual investors in obtaining conditional permanent residence and in removing conditions from permanent residence.

 Admitted in the District of Columbia and Maryland. Not admitted in Virginia. Practice limited to federal immigration practice.