On June 27, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published an interim final rule that compresses the civil penalty timeline under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Although the text focuses on fines against non-citizens, the new procedure may reshape the enforcement framework that U.S. employers encounter whenever Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reviews Form I-9 records, H-1B program files, or other immigration-related activities. Coupled with the higher penalty amounts that took effect earlier this year, the rule may increase both the speed and the financial consequences of non-compliance. 

Overview of DHS’ June 27 Interim Rule

  • The interim final rule is effective immediately; public comments are due by July 28, 2025.
  • Appeals of civil fines now go to a DHS supervisory officer, rather than the Department of Justice’s Board of Immigration Appeals, shortening the contest process.
  • ICE can transfer unpaid penalties to the Department of the Treasury sooner, accelerating collection.
  • The rule applies to fines arising under INA sections 240B(d), 274D, 275(b), and related provisions, but its streamlined procedures suggest a broader enforcement posture that may reach employers through I-9 and worksite audits.

Current Civil Penalty Amounts for Employers

The dollar amounts below were adjusted for inflation on Jan. 2, 2025, and remain in force under the procedures introduced on June 27.

  • Knowingly hiring or continuing to employ an unauthorized worker: $716 to $28,619 per individual, depending on prior violations.
  • Form I-9 paperwork errors: $288 to $2,861 per form.
  • Document fraud violations (first offense): $590 to $4,730; subsequent offenses up to $11,823.
  • Prohibited fee-shifting or indemnity bonds: $2,861 per occurrence.

These amounts apply to penalties assessed after Jan. 2, 2025, for conduct that occurred on or after Nov. 2, 2015.

June 27 Rule’s Potential Implications for HR and Compliance Teams

  • Faster enforcement: ICE will now issue, serve, and collect fine on an accelerated timetable, reducing the opportunity to negotiate or cure deficiencies before money is due.
  • Lower appeal threshold: Internal DHS review replaces the multi-layer process previously available, giving employers fewer procedural safeguards and less time to respond to investigations.
  • Heightened deterrence: The combination of larger fines and swifter collection indicates DHS intends civil penalties to play a more prominent role in worksite enforcement.

Considerations for U.S. Employers

There are several proactive measures U.S. employers may consider to prepare themselves in the event of a government audit. These include:

  • Run an internal I-9 and E-Verify audit
    • Verify that all active and terminated employee files are complete and accurate.
    • Work with outside counsel to correct deficient forms and put in place an “audit ready” response protocol. 
  • Check H-1B and PERM records
    • Confirm public access files, LCAs, and wage data reflect the prevailing-wage schedule that began July 1, 2025.
    • Confirm no immigration costs have been passed to employees in violation of fee-shifting rules.
  • Refresh document-fraud training
    • Train recruiters and hiring managers to recognize counterfeit or altered identity documents.
  • Update notice-of-fine response protocol
    • Designate a point person in legal or HR to manage ICE correspondence; the shorter contest window may require triage. 
  • Revisit vendor and staffing contracts
    • Add clauses requiring third-party contractors to certify adherence to Form I-9 and work-authorization rules and to indemnify the company for violations.

Takeaways

  • The June 27, 2025, interim final rule allows ICE to impose and collect civil penalties more quickly than before.
  • Maximum fines now reach nearly $29,000 per unauthorized worker and almost $3,000 per deficient I-9 form.
  • Employers should shore up compliance programs, audit existing files, and establish rapid-response procedures for potential future enforcement actions.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Ian Macdonald Ian Macdonald

Ian R. Macdonald Co-Chairs the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice’s International Employment, Immigration & Workforce Strategies group. He focuses his practice on developing, assessing and managing global mobility programs for multinational companies on a range of challenges affecting the movement of people capital

Ian R. Macdonald Co-Chairs the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice’s International Employment, Immigration & Workforce Strategies group. He focuses his practice on developing, assessing and managing global mobility programs for multinational companies on a range of challenges affecting the movement of people capital domestically and internationally, including secondment agreements, benefits transferability, local host country employment concerns and immigration.

Ian and his team work closely with companies to manage and modify, where needed, corporate immigration programs to maximize efficiency, service and regulatory compliance levels. He is experienced with the full range of business immigration sponsorship categories (visas and permanent residence), anti-discrimination rules to reduce or eliminate risk of employment litigation, employer sanction cases, and I-9 and E-Verify compliance. Ian assists clients with establishing risk-based performance standards (RBPS) and Department of Homeland Security protocol, providing risk assessment assistance to corporations subject to Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) and assisting clients with ITAR/Export Control compliance within the immigration context.

Ian has developed strategic relationships abroad that he utilizes when working with clients to ensure compliance with foreign registration requirements. He is experienced with analyzing complex global mobility opportunities on country-specific matters to facilitate the transfer of personnel. Ian is also experienced in counseling employers on immigration strategy as well as immigration consequences of mergers and acquisitions, reduction in workforces, and furloughs.

Prior to joining the firm, Ian worked for the United Nations, various non-governmental think tanks and corporate law firms in London, Washington, D.C., New York and Atlanta.